|
It's pretty hard to argue there is any downside for the
client, when we shop among roughly twenty lenders, find
them the best deal at the time they want to lock, pay
all their closing costs on their first mortgage WITHOUT
raising the interest rate and insist that they cross
shop us to make sure that we are giving them the best
deal.
What's not to like?
Try not to remove context, Montrose. It's why I do not
trim things. Saves people some time in seeing what
morons like you are up to.
http://www.real-reform.org/pcnonebas.pdf
--
Jay Reifert -- Fitchburg/Madison ****** http://www.real-reform.org
http://profiles.yahoo.com/jay_reifert** http://www.true-agent.com
http://www.madison-real-estate.com
mailto:true-agents@12345true-agent.com <-----------Remember to
remove the numbers from
the email address before
hitting send.
Montrose wrote:
> On 3-Apr-2006, "Jay Reifert" <true-agents@12345true-agent.com> wrote:
>
>> So long as what I am doing is in the best interests of my
>> client, there is no conflict of interest. Although, I
>> can understand why a mortgage broker would feel threatened
>> by the fact that I provide those services to my clients.
>
> Yet you think everyone who shows and lists homes are conflicted? You
> have an amazing ability to rationalize what's in your best interest.
> I must say you are the biggest idiot I have seen in a long time. You
> ought to have your own radio show! You could come on after Rush.
>
> BTW learn to quote and trim posts. If you are going to communicate on
> USENET at least take the time to educate yourself in how to use it
> properly. Your stupidity will be archived for many years.
|
|