|
And if you think it is appropriate for RealtorsŪ to use
Procuring Cause as a way to trap unsuspecting buyers,
you are--at the least--condoning theft, if not participating,
yourself--and are not worthy of respect. Pure and simple.
Explain to me...why should a buyer be obligated to use an
agent who represents the sellers best interests, when the
agent has not made that clear, and has also not made it
clear that simply visiting a home, whether a private viewing
or at an open house, creates an OBLIGATION to the accompanying
RealtorŪ?
State laws require disclosure. The common law of agency
requires fair treatment of third partises. This belief you
apparently have is out of conformity with both.
http://www.real-reform.org/pcnonebas.pdf
--
Jay Reifert -- Fitchburg/Madison ****** http://www.real-reform.org
http://profiles.yahoo.com/jay_reifert** http://www.true-agent.com
http://www.madison-real-estate.com
mailto:true-agents@12345true-agent.com <-----------Remember to
remove the numbers from
the email address before
hitting send.
Steve Horrillo wrote:
> On 6-Apr-2006, "Jay Reifert" <true-agents@12345true-agent.com> wrote:
>
>> As for you Steve, I cannot help it you were too cowardly to
>> have a discussion with me over--<gasp><gasp><gasp>--a,
>> <gasp> , telephone! You're a RealtorŪ. I am a (hostage)
>> RealtorŪ. As such, I've tools to look you up, and I did.
>
> I was on the highway when you called. I do not talk and drive on a busy
> highway. When I later listened to the tone of your message and use of
> phrases like "you people," "theft," and "the party's over," why would
> any sane person waste their time bantering with you. If I felt you
> had even a slightly open mind I'd. The ONLY reason I answer you
> on the Newsgroups is in the hopes I can help those with an open mind.
> You my friend are a waste case.
|
|
Re: ATT Real Estate Agents... What do you want in a mortgage broker?
