|
larrybud2002@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>We're not talking about a shared wall, we're talking about a guy
>>
>>hanging up a sign in property that he bought on his own balcony.
>>
>>If it is on the outside of the condo, in virtually every state this
>>would be a common-property wall.
>>
>>
>>>They shouldn't. They should be able to do with their property as they
>>
>>see fit.
>>
>>Within the constraints of any restrictions that were part of the deed or
>>contract that they signed when they bought their property.
>
>
> My argument is that those constraints are a violation of an
> individual's property rights. You cannot just write up anything in CCR
> and say that they're legal. There's law that takes precedence over a
> CCR. To take it to the extreme, for example, you cannot write into a
> CCR that it's OK to murder within the condo limits, because we have a
> Constitutional right to life. Likewise, you shouldn't be able to tell
> me I cannot express my freedom of speech my hanging a sign (whatever it
> may say) because I've first amendment rights. The Constitution trumps
> all.
>
Wrong!
If you don't use it you lose it!
You haven't used your constitutional rights and like many stupid
Americans you don't even know your constitutional rights so you don't
have any.
Remember the flying US flag incident in Florida? One man was fighting
and no stupid American helped him. The Governor Jeb Bush came to visit
him and gave him $100 to offset his fine cost which was $100 per day.
This will tell you that this country is made out of "Fucking Assholes"
-Sub
>
>>>Their property rights end where mine begin and vice versa. Me hanging
>>
>>a sign on my property in no way violates someone elses property rights.
>>
>>Unless you agreed when you moved in not to hang any signs. In that case
>>the other members of the association have the right to be free of the
>>visual clutter associated with your sign.
>
>
> They may have the power to do so, but they certainly do not have the
> right.
>
|
|