|
Maxwell wrote:
> "Lou" <loupark@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1170597634.786618.94210@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
>> Consider how many times a person asks a question because they are
>> stuck or cannot find the answer on an
>> older newsgroup page. Now consider how many completly stupid answers
>> he gets from the morons that do not really
>> know what their talking about. After a while of hearing complete
>> stupidity instead of helpful answers it's now wonder
>> the post have slowed down. I cannot tell you how many times I have posted
>> because I want to try something different, and the
>> number one answer for the self appointed experts is "follow the
>> plans". Some answer for an experimental group.
>> Lou
>>
>
> Hi Lou, I do not know you from Adam, but I agree with this 100%. We seem
> completely overwhelmed with negative contributors, and real short on
> positive input. One of my observations has been how quickly someone suggests
> we can solve all questions by sending the posted to search the archives. It
> always completely ingores the possibility someone might have joined the
> group recently with fresh input on a subject.
>
>
Agreed, but I would add doing an archive search is not always easy if you
do not ask the question correctly in the first place. I've had cases
where I've gotten the answers I news groups when someone points out
the correct term for something. I'd direct someone to archives if
they want more than what I can give.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
|
|
Re: Is there a problem with rah?
