|
"me" <bigd@verizon.net> wrote
> From my vantage point this looks like simple greed on the
> part of Mr. Dyke for the sale of another set of drawings.
>
> Am I missing something? Has anybody actually seen this
> notion applied as a legal precedent in the past?
Mr. Dyke has always had questionable business practices, IMHO. Too bad. It
is a neat plane.
I'd advise the prospective buyer to go ahead with the project. There
are others out there that have built the plans that would help, I'm sure.
--
Jim in NC
|
|