|
"john smith" <jsmith@net.net> wrote in message
news:jsmith-3534EC.11381305112005@news-rdr-02.ohiordc.rr.com...
> > From my vantage point this looks like simple greed on the
> > part of Mr. Dyke for the sale of another set of drawings.
> >
> > Am I missing something? Has anybody actually seen this
> > notion applied as a legal precedent in the past?
>
> Who is being greedy here?
> What prevents the plans from being resold indefinitely each time the
> possessor dies and the estate tries to make money off from the sale?
> Mr Dyke owns the rights to the plans. If someone wants to buy a set of
> plans and build the aircraft, they should be purchasing the plans from
> Mr Dyke, not an estate of someone who had purchased a set of plans from
> Mr Dyke.
Soo..on your logic, if I purchase say...a new car, and I sell it, there
should be no support from the car manufacturer for the new owner?
Ric
|
|
Re: John Dyke
