|
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:40:26 GMT, bigd@verizon.net (me) wrote:
:
:What I wanted to know is: Has anybody seen another seller
:deny that a set of drawings/instructions/information was
:transferable due to the simple fact that work on the project
:had not begun before the resale? Is there some kind of
:precedent here? Or is Dyke making it up as he goes?
:
When I was involved with Berkut (a kit plane), we had a clause in the
contract that if the kit was sold, we would continue to provide
customer support if we were paid a transfer fee. I think it was $250,
but it's been too long to remember.
I think - but I am not certain - that Nat Puffer did not provide
builder support if plans were resold, regardless if there was a
project or not. This is the first time I have heard of something like
you describe with John.
(NB- John is a bit of a curmudgeon, but I both like him and respect
him a lot.)
|
|
Re: John Dyke
