|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 18:51:08 -0500, "Mac the Nice"
<jpdm45@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Anopheles" <hison@jeack.com.au> wrote in message
>news:4deohlF19ljdbU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Mac the Nice" wrote:
>>> Just thought I would share the contents of an email I sent off moments ago to
>>> a lady real estate agent in New Mexico . . .
>>> --
>>>
>>> Hello There!
>>>
>>> You wrote, quite humorously, as follows in your reply . . .
>>>
>>>
>>>>The said subdivision is a tract
>>>>of land with 40 acre parcels (not subdividable) with great
>>>>restrictions and covenants.
>>>
>>> We have seen many a "restriction" and "covenant", during our time of
>>> prospecting for, finding and owning real estate, but as to just how
>>> comically "great" such nosy neighbor intrusions into an American
>>> citizen's private property rights may get, how widespread and popular
>>> they may be with the various regulation-happy "up-scale" elites, I've
>>> no idea.
>>>
>>> So, my dear fellow citizen of this, our great golden land of liberty, I
>>> can only tell you this: As we go looking for larger tracts of property
>>> out in the hinterlands of the U.S.A., it is because we love having space
>>> around us in a place where we can go out of our house in the morning to a
>>> vista of trees and sun and sky, that we may even have mountains out there
>>> on the rise between us and any sight of the absolutely aggravating view
>>> of other people's pushy little noses and prying eyes being poked into our
>>> privacy! We've had it with that, totally.
>>>
>>> So, if you are selling any land upon which there will be no restriction
>>> to the ownership thereof, if you have some lovely stretch of pristine
>>> ground upon which we can build, drill for water, plant our roses, peppers
>>> and tomatoes, a spot which will be all ours and ours alone to enjoy as we
>>> see fit, subject to nothing other than the laws of the State of New
>>> Mexico, and the United States of America with none of these "great"
>>> nose-poking (or picking) liberty-trashing, stinky, puny "restrictions"
>>> stuck to them like so much runny dried snot, do please feel free--always
>>> first and foremost be FREE, dear lady, to speak your piece and send us
>>> your Yaaaahoooo! ;-)
>>>
>>> Thank You Very Kindly,
>>> --
>>
>> Would an acre in Palestine suit?
>
>How 'bout an acre up yer ol' ripe and rugged Aussie "Outback", wherein no
>fences, nor walls, covenants, restrictions, threats of winging boomerangs or
>No Tresspassing signs need apply except as to any of that manly Crocodile
>Dundee or Davy Crockett sort as would, in a pioneering, coonskin cap frame
>of mind think to reply?
>--
>Mackie
Ignorant cunt. You're actually going to try to insult him with
reference to the Australian landscape? You know nothing of the rest of
the world, only the urine-stench strew surrounding your rust-fucked
camper shell on cinder block (and that's someone else's parcel you're
squatting on anyway). This would apply allegorically to your
skull-dwelling as well.
Take the occupied Palestine deal, cunt. It beckons like shit to blue
bottle fly.
*********
www.tooangry.blogspot.com
*********
|
|
Re: Mackie Answers the Realtor
