|
In article <1179501905.624332.176930@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> On May 17, 6:03 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On May 17, 7:55 am, fredfigh...@spamcop.net wrote:
> >
> > > On May 16, 8:06 pm, N114RW <qwerty_...@charter.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > ...
> >
> > > > Does the issue for maneuvering speed now become the motor mounts,
> > > > battery box, seats. etc? If I am certain that the weak point isn't
> > > > these things, but the main airframe itself, can I use the maneuvering
> > > > airspeed for maximum weight?
> >
> > > Even ignoring flutter, what about damage to elements of the
> > > control system itself like hinges, horns, pulleys, bellcranks,
> > > etc?
> >
> > All of that stuff has to meet minimum strength requirements.
> > FAR 23 has it all buried there somewhere. It's all pretty strong.
> >
>
> I should hope so.
>
> But IIUC, the question was, WHEN something breaks,
> what breaks first? The elevator departing the aircraft
> is one possibility, yes?
It really doesn't matter! If any critical part fails, the rest goes with
it.
|
|
Re: Manovering Speed
