|
Really? so the whole staff gets flipped?
Brad
BTW.......when did you last hear of a kit that wasn't accepted as
amateur built by the FAA?
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:11:20 GMT, "Opie" <yes@that.opie> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ron Wanttaja" <ron.wanttaja@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >news:1iiem2ll9i2o6rnnt63i66ibds5ubip1ul@4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:36:22 GMT, USER <user@newsgroups.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Ummm, well, no. Aircraft still have to go through the certification
> >> process.
> >> The 51%-certification is a nice-to-have, but in itself doesn't guarantee
> >> the FAA
> >> will certify the airplane as Experimental Amateur-Built. It's still
> >> possible
> >> for the FAA to reject certification of an individual aircraft.
> >
> >C'mon Ron. You make it sound like the FAA guys are an officious bunch of
> >self righteous bureaucrats!
>
> For the next (at least) two years, they'll be officious self-lefteous
> bureaucrats. :-)
>
> Ron Wanttaja
|
|
Re: Pipistrel Kit Aircraft now FAA 51% Accepted
