|
"Ron Wanttaja" <ron.wanttaja@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cprhm25he6oc4fsj50827rn9s343t87882@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:20:28 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" <flybd5@prtc.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Brad" <2ferrets@gte.net> wrote in message
>>news:1164436198.678332.322980@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>> They could still get a Experimental-Exhibition tho right? Not quite the
>>> freedom a Amateur built COFA gives, but can still fly it.
>>
>>That depends where they stick you in the Exp/Exh structure. Some of the
>>subcategories are more restrictive than others.
>
> The guys building the Me262s in Washington State came within a gnat's
> eyelash of
> getting them Experimental/Amateur-Built. The DAR was going to sign them
> off,
> but the local FSDO refused to allow it. They've got Exp/Exh, but with
> pretty
> loose restrictions.
You wouldn't have a copy of their op limitations, do ya? :)
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
Re: Pipistrel Kit Aircraft now FAA 51% Accepted
