Re: Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing?

Re: Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing?

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 misc.consumers.house    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing? Mark Lloyd Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
Re: Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing? Mark Lloyd 01-14-2007
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:59:14 -0600, Alan Moorman@visi.com wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:46:09 GMT, "Rick Brandt"
><rickbrandt2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> In my opinon...no.
>>>
>>> I intentionally try to have older appliances, vehicles, machines to
>>> lower repair costs and keep overall ownership cost to a minimum.
>>>
>>> Your thoughts?
>>>
>>> TMT
>>>
>>> Irreparable damageBy Bryce Baschuk
>>> THE WASHINGTON TIMES
>>> January 9, 2007
>>> Bill Jones, after 42 years, is finally closing the Procter Appliance
>>> Service shop in Silver Spring.
>>> "You cannot make a good salary to survive on the way you could years
>>> ago," said the 61-year-old owner of the oven, refrigerator and
>>> washer-dryer repair shop. "Everything has changed in the appliance
>>> business."
>>
>>This raises an apparent contradiction. Most people believe that appliances
were

>>built much better in the past than they are now and yet in the past a whole
>>industry survived on doing appliance repairs. Perhaps they only seemed to be
>>built better in the past because we kept them longer and the only reason we
kept

>>them longer is because we repaired them instead of replacing them. The
flipside

>>of that same coin is that perhaps today's appliances only seem to be inferior
>>because we replace them more often and the only reason we replace them more
>>often is because we do not repair them.
>>
>>
>>
>I think the main problem with today's appliances is that
>they are NOT made so that they can be repaired.
>
>Modules are stamped together, molded together, whatever and
>the little part that wears out cannot be replaced without
>replacing the whole module, which probably is not available,
>anyway, so the appliance gets tossed.
>
>I've an old toaster from the '40s or '50s. It is a
>mechanical thing, not electronic, and is made of individual
>parts that can be cleaned, oiled, and if you could get them,
>replaced as needed. When something like this stops working,
>less than an hour's work will set it up to run for another
>25 years!
>
>
>
>Alan
>

When I bought this house, there was a problem with the built-in oven
(an older Frigidaire). The (mechanical) clock (that I didn't need)
wouldn't keep time but made a loud UHH-UHH-UHH noise all the time. I
disconnected the wire to it, something I'd never have been able to
do with a modern oven.
--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com

"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent
force for atheism ever conceived." -- Isaac Asimov


other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog