|
"Morgans" <jsmorgan@charterJUNK.net> wrote in message
news:VM_Mh.87$uP6.46@newsfe04.lga...
>
> " jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote
> >
> > Whatever the reason for the FAA hostility for powder coating, I
have
> > receive pma'd parts that were powdercoated, or "powercoated" as a
> > member of my EAA chapter calls it.
>
> Cute <g>
>
> Although I've never had, or seen, an aircraft "powercoated" part
crack, I
> have seen other powder coated steel parts crack, and the
powdercoated crack
> remained hidden.
I wouldn't use powdercoat on an engine mount, for sure and not on a
4130 fuselage. But it came on the lift strut of a PA-18 and a
rudder-- both PMA'd.
I'd use it on the step (or stirrup) that helps you get into the
cockpit. There you need it because of all the wear you would have on
paint.
I've seen it used with great esthetic appeal on yokes.
>
> I'd not choose powdercoating for a finish for anything I built.
>
> Besides that, I can spray paints, myself, and can not so easily
powdercoat
> anything.
Eastwood has a kit you can buy which is cheap and easy to use. You
just need an oven to cure it in once you've got it sprayed on your
part. The powder is attracted to the part by a high voltage.
I'd not use powdercoat on highly stressed parts but it certainly
has a use in places on some aircraft, especially where the wear on
paint keeps you having to recoat it.
> --
> Jim in NC
>
James in WNC
:)
|
|
Re: Powder Coat on 4130
