|
Bill Zaleski wrote:
> I've had the Air Plains O-360 conversion in my 172N for 16 years
> (3500 hours now). I'm an A&P and IA. The Air Plains documentation
> is much better, the installation is easier, and the product support is
> great. It makes a poor man's 182 out of a 172, No complaints. Penn
> Yan is right in my back yard, but I do not regret getting my STC from
> the Kansas facility.
A '65 C172 that I used to rent had their Air Plains conversion combined
with a Powerflow exhaust. Overall performance seemed comparable to a
new 172SP. Given my experience, if I was facing engine
rebuild/replacement on a similar C172, I would consider the superhawk
conversion.
--
Jack Allison
PP-ASEL-Instrument Airplane
Arrow N2104T
"To become a Jedi knight, you must master a single force. To become
a private pilot you must strive to master four of them"
- Rod Machado
(Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail)
|
|
Re: Seeking opinion on Penn Yan SuperHawk O-360
