|
While this is true the "Holder does not meet ICAO requirements" statement
would still be the case of a PP operating under the LSP rules without a
medical.
"OtisWinslow" <OtisWinslow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FBoef.114502$xl1.57640@fe03.news.easynews.com...
>A private pilot flying with no medical doesn't have a SP certificate. He
>has
> a PP certificate. Someone trained through SP would have a SP certificate.
>
>
>
> "Ron Wanttaja" <ron.wanttaja@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:91gfn1pevbogjhp2s5hr7fasbu9q16fphf@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:13:31 -0700, "Frank" <frank@laczko.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know if a private pilot flying under the sport pilot rules
>>> (no
>>> medical), flying an experimental plane meeting the LSA rules can fly to
>>> and
>>> within Canada?
>>
>> The simple answer: No
>> ----------------------------
>> §61.315 What are the privileges and limits of my sport pilot
>> certificate?
>>
>> [Snip]
>>
>> (c) You may not act as pilot in command of a light-sport aircraft:
>> [....]
>> (8) Outside the United States, unless you have prior authorization
>> from the country in which you seek to operate. Your sport
>> pilot certificate carries the limit "Holder does not meet ICAO
>> requirements."
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> (http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2922572C)
>>
>> Canada could institute some sort of policy to allow US Sport Pilots to
>> fly into
>> the country, but I have not heard anything about it.
>>
>> Ron Wanttaja
>>
>
>
|
|
Re: Sport Pilot flying to Canada
