Re: Status of Steve Parks stalking

 alt.home.lawn.garden    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Re: Status of Steve Parks stalking DrDeath 08-18-2006
Posted by DrDeath on August 18, 2006, 7:55 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Steveo wrote:
>> Be sure to show them this too, you sniveling sissy.
>
>
> You have posted no less than three addresses of various Georgia residents
> (and most probably more than that) in the hopes that someone else will
> assault or murder the residents of those addresses; and you have the
> never to call someone else a sissy? It seems like you are quite a
> coward; based clearly on your actions to date. A coward and a felon.
> At any rate; you have been requested in email and usenet to curb your
> felonious actions and false accusations; and at this point your posts
> will just continue to be accumulated for presentation to the proper
> authorities.
>
>
>
> Georgia
>
> 16-5-90 G
>
> A person commits the offense of stalking when he or she follows, places
> under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or
> places
> without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and
> intimidating the other person. For the purpose of this article, the terms
> "computer" and "computer network" shall have the same meanings as set out
> in
> Code Section 16-9-92; the term "contact" shall mean any communication
> including without being limited to communication in person, by telephone,
> by
> mail, by broadcast, by computer, by computer network, or by any other
> electronic device; and the place or places that contact by telephone,
> mail,
> broadcast, computer, computer network, or any other electronic device is
> deemed to occur shall be the place or places where such communication is
> received. For the purpose of this article, the term "place or places"
> shall
> include any public or private property occupied by the victim other than
> the
> residence of the defendant. For the purposes of this article, the term
> "harassing and intimidating" means a knowing and willful course of conduct
> directed at a specific person which causes emotional distress by placing
> such person in reasonable fear for such person's safety or the safety of a
> member of his or her immediate family, by establishing a pattern of
> harassing and intimidating behavior, and which serves no legitimate
> purpose.
> This Code section shall not be construed to require that an overt threat
> of
> death or bodily injury has been made.
>
> A person commits the offense of stalking when such person, in violation of
> a
> bond to keep the peace posted pursuant to Code Section 17-6-110, standing
> order issued under Code Section 19-1-1, temporary restraining order,
> temporary protective order, permanent restraining order, permanent
> protective order, preliminary injunction, or permanent injunction or
> condition of pretrial release, condition of probation, or condition of
> parole in effect prohibiting the harassment or intimidation of another
> person, broadcasts or publishes, including electronic publication, the
> picture, name, address, or phone number of a person for whose benefit the
> bond, order, or condition was made and without such person's consent in
> such
> a manner that causes other persons to harass or intimidate such person and
> the person making the broadcast or publication knew or had reason to
> believe
> that such broadcast or publication would cause such person to be harassed
> or
> intimidated by others.
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
Hey asshole, the authorities will do nothing about your whining and
sniveling as you are nothing more than a net.kook. Your posts are archived
just as Steveo's are. They will look at this as a stupid flame war.



Posted by DrDeath on August 20, 2006, 10:33 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> DrDeath wrote:
>> Hey asshole, the authorities will do nothing about your whining and
>> sniveling as you are nothing more than a net.kook. Your posts are
>> archived just as Steveo's are. They will look at this as a stupid
>> flame war.
>
> Your internet buddy Steveo posted 3 addresses and phone numbers looking to
> find anti-semites and homophobic skinheads to attack my family (including
> 5 young children). Two of the addresses were of people he didn't even
> know; and one was my last home from 2000 - 2003. Someone in this group
> also told me that he contacted my last employer and my present bank.
> There is nothing flame-war about that; and it most certainly is not the
> act of someone who is just having a little fun and doing some teasing.
> That is a felony; and he is putting people (including children) at risk.
>
>
First, I don't need your jail house legalese so I snipped it and would
appreciate you not responding to my posts with it.
Secondly, I have read a lot about YOU! You crap is all over the net, do
search of your own posts, your a nutjob. So much so that the net.kooks have
a site dedicated to you. So your post are most certainly questionable at
best.
Third, I have sat here watching you cyberharrass Steveo to no end and he
isn't even pissed at you judging from his posts as compared to the Dogie
incident.
Do us on RRCB and take it somewhere else, I for one am growing bored with
your incessant whining.
I'm crossposting this to alt.kook as I think you should have a nomination,
as I believe you have a shot at beating Mark Morgan and Lloyd Davees.



Posted by DrDeath on August 20, 2006, 10:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> DrDeath wrote:
>> Third, I have sat here watching you cyberharrass Steveo to no end and
>> he isn't even pissed at you judging from his posts as compared to the
>> Dogie incident.
>
> Take off your blinders. The parts you missed were:

I missed nothing.

> 1) I was not even doing much on Usenet until Steveo wrote me via email
> and accused me of harassing him on usenet. He said he was going to "get
> even", even though I had done nothing. When I told him it was not me, he
> ignored that; as he didn't believe me.

Unlikely.

> 2) Outside of RRC, Steveo immediately started a campaign of slandering;
> using the name of my late wife and present wife in his headers; also
> including words like "kike", "hooknose", and "faggot" in the headers.
> Would you like to see those, DrDeath the Steveo apologist?

Since you decided to call me his apologist, no I don't. But I have read your
kook faq.

> 3) Steveo starts posting addresses and phone numbers of people he
> believes might be me. To my knowledge he posted at least 3 so far; but
> it might be more. I can google it if you really don't believe that.

I can google for myself, and you really suck up the Usenet juice.

> 4) Steveo starts writing threatening letters to my personal email; and
> continues after I tell him to stop writing. I have those.

And he has yours.

> 5) Steveo starts misusing pictures of me. That is the most petty of the
> issues, but still illegal.

Now your just whining. It is not illegal.

> 6) Steveo contacts my ex employer. That employer was in California; so
> that is an interstate issue.

So prove it to law enforcement, your certainly not proving it by me.
Maybe you will qualify for the meltdown award.
BTW, do you own a CB?



Posted by Steveo on August 20, 2006, 10:47 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> > DrDeath wrote:
> >> Third, I have sat here watching you cyberharrass Steveo to no end and
> >> he isn't even pissed at you judging from his posts as compared to the
> >> Dogie incident.
> >
> > Take off your blinders. The parts you missed were:
>
> I missed nothing.
>
> > 1) I was not even doing much on Usenet until Steveo wrote me via email
> > and accused me of harassing him on usenet. He said he was going to
> > "get even", even though I had done nothing. When I told him it was not
> > me, he ignored that; as he didn't believe me.
>
> Unlikely.
>
> > 2) Outside of RRC, Steveo immediately started a campaign of
> > slandering; using the name of my late wife and present wife in his
> > headers; also including words like "kike", "hooknose", and "faggot"
> > in the headers. Would you like to see those, DrDeath the Steveo
> > apologist?
>
> Since you decided to call me his apologist, no I don't. But I have read
> your kook faq.
>
> > 3) Steveo starts posting addresses and phone numbers of people he
> > believes might be me. To my knowledge he posted at least 3 so far;
> > but it might be more. I can google it if you really don't believe
> > that.
>
> I can google for myself, and you really suck up the Usenet juice.
>
> > 4) Steveo starts writing threatening letters to my personal email;
> > and continues after I tell him to stop writing. I have those.
>
> And he has yours.
>
> > 5) Steveo starts misusing pictures of me. That is the most petty of
> > the issues, but still illegal.
>
> Now your just whining. It is not illegal.
>
> > 6) Steveo contacts my ex employer. That employer was in California;
> > so that is an interstate issue.
>
> So prove it to law enforcement, your certainly not proving it by me.
> Maybe you will qualify for the meltdown award.
> BTW, do you own a CB?
>
CB is so 70's, 80's, 90's..what's next 20's? :)

Scott Gilbert has many kook miles on his odometer, he's still imagines he's
rolling down the eastern seaboard with no radio. 10-4

Posted by DrDeath on August 20, 2006, 10:58 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>> > DrDeath wrote:
>> >> Third, I have sat here watching you cyberharrass Steveo to no end and
>> >> he isn't even pissed at you judging from his posts as compared to the
>> >> Dogie incident.
>> >
>> > Take off your blinders. The parts you missed were:
>>
>> I missed nothing.
>>
>> > 1) I was not even doing much on Usenet until Steveo wrote me via email
>> > and accused me of harassing him on usenet. He said he was going to
>> > "get even", even though I had done nothing. When I told him it was not
>> > me, he ignored that; as he didn't believe me.
>>
>> Unlikely.
>>
>> > 2) Outside of RRC, Steveo immediately started a campaign of
>> > slandering; using the name of my late wife and present wife in his
>> > headers; also including words like "kike", "hooknose", and "faggot"
>> > in the headers. Would you like to see those, DrDeath the Steveo
>> > apologist?
>>
>> Since you decided to call me his apologist, no I don't. But I have read
>> your kook faq.
>>
>> > 3) Steveo starts posting addresses and phone numbers of people he
>> > believes might be me. To my knowledge he posted at least 3 so far;
>> > but it might be more. I can google it if you really don't believe
>> > that.
>>
>> I can google for myself, and you really suck up the Usenet juice.
>>
>> > 4) Steveo starts writing threatening letters to my personal email;
>> > and continues after I tell him to stop writing. I have those.
>>
>> And he has yours.
>>
>> > 5) Steveo starts misusing pictures of me. That is the most petty of
>> > the issues, but still illegal.
>>
>> Now your just whining. It is not illegal.
>>
>> > 6) Steveo contacts my ex employer. That employer was in California;
>> > so that is an interstate issue.
>>
>> So prove it to law enforcement, your certainly not proving it by me.
>> Maybe you will qualify for the meltdown award.
>> BTW, do you own a CB?
>>
> CB is so 70's, 80's, 90's..what's next 20's? :)
>
> Scott Gilbert has many kook miles on his odometer, he's still imagines
> he's
> rolling down the eastern seaboard with no radio. 10-4

I'm sure the closest he has ever come to a CB is when he works the pickle
park.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Updated garden status May 10, 2007, 9:19 am

The site map in XML format XML site map
Contact Us | Privacy Policy