|
Larry Bud wrote:
>>>>I recall that prior to the U.S. HOA Bolsheviks (Bush and his clique)
>>>>legislation to legalize torture as viable form of the interrogation, and
>>>>skirting the Geneva Convention agreements, the enemy usually returned
>>>>all US soldiers. In the first Iraq war all have been returned
>>>>relatively unharmed.
>>>
>>>
>>>The Geneva Convention applieds to soldiers fighting for a country. The
>>>reason it applies only to them is because recognized countries signed
>>>the Geneva Convention. The first Iraq war was just that.
>>>
>>>The war we are in now with Al-Queda isn't with a country, it's with a
>>>philosophy and religion, therefore the Geneva Convention does not apply
>>>to them.
>>>
>>>Where's your outcry against those who mutilated the US soldiers?
>
>
>
>>Your explanation is moronic interpretation by BUSH to brutalize the
>>world with his idiotic war on terrorism.
>
>
> It's not an interpretation, it's what the Geneva convention says. If
> you can find where Al-Queda signed the Geneva convention treaty, show
> me.
>
A combatant is a person who takes a direct part in the hostilities of an
armed conflict who upon capture qualifies for prisoner of war under the
Third Geneva Convention (GCIII). An unlawful combatant is someone, such
as a mercenary, who take a direct part in the hostilities but who upon
capture does not qualify for prisoner of war status.[1]
To qualify for Prisoner of war status persons waging war must have the
following characteristics to be protected by the laws of war:
1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict
2. or members of militias not under the command of the armed forces
* that of being commanded by a person responsible for his
subordinates;
* that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a
distance;
* that of carrying arms openly;
* that of conducting their operations in accordance with the
laws and customs of war.
3. or are members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to
a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.
4. or inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach
of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces,
without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units,
provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.
Based on the above the AL-Queda (mujahadine) would qualify! It did when
we suported it in Afganistan against Russians.
>
>>If the AL-Queda is philosophy and religion and Geneva Convention does
>>not apply to them, than US soldier's mutilation is within that realm.
>
>
> No doubt that Al-Queda doesn't follow the Geneva convention since they
> are not a country and they didn't sign the treaty.
>
Se above!
>
>
>>However, if the US would stop the religious bullshit and bound them to
>>Geneva Convention there would be no mutilations.
>
>
> Ridiculous. How exactly did the attacks on the WTC fall under the
> Geneva Convention? We didn't start this mess. Nutjob Muslims did.
> We're gonna end it, though.
>
We have started it! WTC was executed by CIA!
If you want to be educated you must read publications which are not
controlled by CIA, like ABC, SBS, NBC...... etc.
Read the following.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html
>
>>We have 7 Marines on trial in San Diego for mutilation.
>
>
> What? Wait a minute, what are they doing on trial if we allow the
> random killing of the captured enemy?
>
http://www.knx1070.com/pages/48771.php?
>
>>We have 1000s Marines who will never get punish for their mutilations.
>
>
> Ridiculous.
You have to do your own research to know the truth.
The US governmant will not dish it out for you. That is why they have
embedded news in the army.
>
>
>>It is all bullshit with BUSH's objective to mutilate US constitution and
>>grab my property via the HOA.
>
>
> Your HOA will be the least of your worries if we follow your "action"
> against terrorism.
>
You must always follow who is the beneficiary. So far USA and military
industrial complex is laughing all away to the bank with trillion$.
You will pay for it is soon inflation, foreclosures.... etc.
The Gas is already there.
-Sub
|
|