|
Rick wrote:
> "Subcomandante" <edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:%zZqf.37323$7h7.7564@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>
>>So how can I best invoke a fear in the membership without looking
>>ridiculous?
>>
>>I've good timing because yesterday they received assessment bill.
>>What next?
>>
>>Reason:
>>First reason, is unlawful behavior. It is very difficult to pass it on
>>because people don't know the law and majority will have same attitude
>>like Rick.
>
>
> People will have my attitude if you've already established yourself as a
> nutcase to your neighbors. Hopefully you have not acted in real life like
> you do on Usenet. If you've called all your neighbors mogoloids, you have
> no hope. People will not take you seriously no matter what the facts are.
> If you have not made enemies of all your neighbors yet, try convincing one or
> two of your cause and adding their signatures to the letter you are passing
> out. That will give the appearance of a movement rather than a disgruntled
> kook.
>
> Second thing is that most people differentiate technicalities from unlawful
> behavior. Many people speed, but most people do not consider them criminals.
> In the same regard, if past increases were on the calendar year even though
> legally that isn't your fiscal year, most people will not equate that with
> unlawful behavior. That might be frustrating with you but it is true. Just
> shouting allegations of code violations will not move people.
>
You still don't understand, Rick!
The association can make increases any time of the year providing that
prior to fiscal year submitted pro forma budget and if not it must ask
members for approval.
I don't see an technicality in that!
It is logical and fair and if you violate that than you have criminal mind.
> What you need to focus on is what the board is actually spending needlessly.
> If, what you say is true, $6000 was paid to the president, then that is a
> start. But in my opinion, it won't be enough to demonstrate
> conflict-of-interest. It might be, but it won't get people mad. What will
> get people mad if that $6000 was paid for no justifiable reason. Only if
> you can demonstrate that, then the motive of conflict-of-interest will anger
> people.
>
Like in any socialistic system the board was elected by less than 25%
people don't care because they don't believe that socialism is
inclusive concept. Ironic.... Huh?
> In other words, stop trying to scare people by quoting code violations, and
> start giving them alternatives that will save them money. Once you
> demonstrate alternatives, then you can scare them by showing them the motive
> of why the alternatives were not adopted.
>
I disagree!
People never consider alternatives. The proof is recent special election
in California in which 4 propositions which would fix the state problems
were rejected by people. Even republicans did not show to vote.
The people always act: "Why fixing something if it ain't broken?"
Because they believe that if they try to fix something that they will
brake it even more, which is derived from their lack of knowledge.
Only if they are desperate, people will attempt to fix something in
which case they say: "It is so bad that I can't possibly make it any
worse." Example recalling Governor Gray Davis.
I've made some changes so look at it and let me know NOT what you like
but what give you a negative feeling.
http://woodsidevillage.ocsatire.com/dues/petition.pdf
|
|
Re: Where is due process you HOA Bolsheviks.
