Re: Why no new diesel radials?

Re: Why no new diesel radials?

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 rec.aviation.homebuilt    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: Why no new diesel radials? mike Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
Why no new diesel radials? On-Condition 09-11-2005
On-Condition wrote:

> Most gas radials I have seen/flown had around 8:1 compression,
> that's food for thought. Just wondering though, are the german
> aircooled diesel cylinders intergral with the block?

the WWII era Guiberson and Cat D-200A Radials had 14.3:1 and
15.5:1 respectively. The Guiberson weighed about 1100 pounds
in Tank trim, And that Cat engine started out as an Wright R-1820,
but weighed over 3000 pounds by time Cat beefed it up enough
to be reliable.

**
mike
**




other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog