Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?

Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 rec.aviation.homebuilt    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts? Roger (K8RI) Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts? shrike@cyberspace.org 10-20-2006
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:56:12 GMT, Ed Sullivan <ebs0431@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:58:52 -0400, "Morgans"
><jsmorgan@charterJUNK.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Roger (K8RI)" <ValidAddress@my.com> wrote
>>
>>> How about the Barracuda?
>>
>>Does the Barracuda get its strength from its skin, or from a wooden framework
>>with plywood covering it? I do not know.

I am not sure how much strength the skin addes in the Cuda so I passed
this question on the the Barracuda users group. If my memory holds out
I will bring their answer(s) back.

>
>Again as I recall the Barracuda has a
>Warren Truss Fuselage, that is it has both verticle and diagonal
>members. the strength is shared. On the other hand DeHavilland
>aircraft frame had only verticle members therefore the skin prevented
>the structure from skewing.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog