Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?

Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 rec.aviation.homebuilt    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts? Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts? shrike@cyberspace.org 10-20-2006

budcun@msn.com wrote:
> It is called "complimentary structure". Most GA aircraft have a
> structure consisting of a skin (alum or plywood) that carries most of
> the load. However, the stringers and longerons have an important
> function, that is, they provide out of plane stiffness to the skin,
> thereby preventing it from buckling under load. Each element of the
> structure has an axis about which it is weak, and it needs the other
> elements to provide strength in that direction. They need each other
> very much.
>
> Bud

Semi-Monocoque is the term, not "complimentary." Your
average CessBeeMooPip is semi-monocoque in the aft fuselage. Most of
the rest has heavy structural members and the skin is used just to keep
things square.

Dan



other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog