Re: Wood Floor Cleaner (Long)

Re: Wood Floor Cleaner (Long)

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 alt.home.cleaning    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: Wood Floor Cleaner (Long) Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
Wood Floor Cleaner Quin McCoy 08-09-2006
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:59:17 -0500, "Donna in Texas"
<donna.mr@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Phisherman" wrote:
>>Unless you have pets/children, once every two months should be
>> enough, using a daily dust mop between cleanings.
>
>This is such good advice. Too much mopping isn't good for hardwood
floors.
>And if you use an additive to help the cleaning process, be sure not
to make
>it too strong.
>
>Some people just mop with clear water, but I cannot speak for that.
>
>My cleaning lady uses something that is store-bought. I will have to
find out
>what it is.
>
>Also with your hardwood floors really watch that you do not get water
or
>liquor spilled on the floors. If your floors are not polyurethane,
then you
>might get spots in the similar way that you get spots on your
furniture with
>water drops or rings.
>
>
>
>This is OT, but many of us oldsters probably remember when it was
just the
>thing to do (created by carpet sellers, no doubt) to cover the
beautiful
>hardwood floors with carpet. Hardwood was seen as "old fashioned"
and
>touted as hard to keep clean. :-) Supposedly the carpet would be
better,
>but that carpet brought extra airborne chemicals into the house and
was a
>terrible catcher of dust, however often it was vacuumed. And of
course
>there are the stains that cannot be removed. (And of course then you
need to
>buy more carpet. What good consumers we are.)
>
>And those old houses of the 40s and 50s had the real hardwood---thick
and
>really durable, not like the hardwood floors that I've in my
"modern"
>house. Now durability is a problem in our modern world. But
Madison
>Avenue wanted to sell us carpet, so we bought it, even though the
hardwood
>floors were perfectly good, and with a refinishing every thirty
years, would
>last a lifetime.
>
>Then we went through a period when wood parquet was just "the thing"
to have
>in part of your house---used in combination with carpet, often in the
>entryways.
>
>And the kitchen and bathroom.........In the 50s and before we had
linoleum,
>which had to be waxed on your hands and needs with the old paste wax
(and
>then buffed)every few months. And many women actually mopped every
day in
>the kitchen, but not with anything caustic so as not to wear off the
wax.
>(My mother used to say that her kitchen floor was clean enough to
"eat off
>of." Then along came liquid wax, which was an improvement, since it
didn't
>need buffing.
>
>Then vinyl flooring was developed but had to be waxed. Then some
angel
>from Heaven developed a vinyl flooring that had a shine that (for a
while at
>least) did not have to be waxed. Then the true non-wax vinyl was
developed
>which pretty much didn't need to be waxed. By that time so many of
us were
>working outside the home, and that was terrific. ***And you could
really
>get it clean.***
>
>We even went through a period when indoor/outdoor carpet was used in
the
>kitchen. However you vacuumed, you never got it really clean.
>
>Now, when the "house makeover" people on television enter the target
house,
>they immediately turn up their noses at the vinyl floors. It's just
not
>fashionable. You must have tile, and it must not be the
old-fashioned small
>tile (1 foot square) that was just in fashion about three years
ago-----it
>must be the new 18-inch (or so) tile.
>
>When we went to pick out new kitchen flooring, there weren't even
more than
>6 or 7 samples of vinyl in the store.
>
>The kitchen tiling was touted as the be all and end all of kitchen
and
>bathroom flooring. It would last forever, they said. (But they do
leave
>extra tiles in case the original ones get broken :-) It the
tiling,
>they said, would just be a snap to keep clean. They absolutely did
not
>recommend sealant.
>
>Now I see constant questions on television and in magazines saying
that
>their tile is grungy----how on earth on are they going to get it
clean????
>We've figured out that the grouting is porous, and maybe some tile
is, too.
>Surprise, surprise.
>
>And so it goes.
>
>Some comments::::::: vinyl is less expensive than tiling----no
wonder they
>did the Madison-Avenue sale on tiling. When it's all the rage in the
>magazines and on the television, you can bet that America will pull
up that
>vinyl and put down the expensive tile (or dirt floors, or whatever
the
>product of the moment is).
>
>Now.....the thing about the carpeted bathrooms..........carpet is
faster to
>put down than vinyl (and much easier to take up when it gets dirty
and you
>have to change it) and probably less expensive than the really good
quality
>vinyl that homeowners were used to. You can put down cheap carpet
and it
>will look great long enough for the buyers to make an offer. No
wonder
>the homebuilders were pushing it.
>
>And of course, we went through the shag carpet, plush carpet phases.
For a
>while a couple of years ago shag carpet was making a comeback. But
those
>of us old enough to remember shag had "been there -- done that" and
knew
>better than to buy it again.
>
>The pendulum always swings----- Sometimes there are true
advancements, but
>more and more these days the changes in home decor are "just
somethin' to
>sell," as my dad used to say.
>
>
>But I do truly digress......
>
>Warmest Regards,
>
>Donna
>
>
>
>

Agreed:) such is life. I just noticed the pendulum going the other
way on those HGTV shows too. Pull up the carpet.
aloha,
Beans
--smithfarms.com
farmers of pure kona
roast beans to kona to email


other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog