|
AspiringBroker wrote:
> Steve, I do not know if you are a broker or not but I wish I could agree
> with you as I'm an aspiring broker myself. When you say "single
> listing network", I guess you are talking about MLS. FSBO put my house
> on MLS for $300 and my total cost was $350. That is the biggest
> problem.
>
> Steve wrote:
> > I didn't really mean that FSBO was "useless". I meant that its no
> > threat to the RE business in general, because its too loosely marketed
> > and not presented very well. The problem is that there are too many
> > sites like FSBO. The advantage that brokers have is that they have a
> > single listing network. If you have a mediocre property it could take
> > forever to sell it on FSBO.
I am curious as to how that works. From the buyers view (say
realtor.com), I have never seen an MLS listing where you could contact
the seller directly. Does the "sponsor" agent get the contact info? If
buyers cannot contact you directly, then the value is substantially
diminished. Heck, the sponsor agent should pay the fee for you.
|
|
Re: Your team
