|
|
|
|
|
In article <bb2vh11j8815mi2ghaeqit00k10tilg0mg@4ax.com>, Ron Wanttaja says...
>
>On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:49:29 GMT, "Steve Foley" <steve.foley@DELETE.att.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Chuck,
>>
>>Can't you find one of those ambulance chasers that advertise on daytime
>>television to take a libel case on contingency?
>
>To interest any lawyer in a contingency case, there has to be a "deep pocket"
>somewhere for any judgement to be paid from. And there is not any, here.
Ron's right the only way I could get an attorney to take a case like this is to
pay for it out of pocket.And even if I win a judgment I'd have to try to
collect. zoom knows this and in this regard he has a certain amount of
protection in doing what he does. Some day when I've some spare $1000's to
spend I may sue just on principle.
In the meantime I'll do what I can to expose him for what he is, a Phony and a
liar and I can prove that.
See ya
Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret
|
|
|
|
Re: ZZZZZZ OK Chuck, here is the ammo you have been waiting for.
