|
Nan wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:17:34 -0600, Piper
> <piperetteMYSOCKS@direcway.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:29:01 -0000, "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael A. Ball wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:50:51 -0000, "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BeesMom9905 wrote:
>>>>>> New question - People are carrying bottles of rubbing alcohol...
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you serious? What on earth is it coming to, cleaning shopping
>>>>> trolleys? cleaning public toilets?
>>>>> dear oh dear
>>>>
>>>> Well, just what is "it"? And what do you think it is coming to? LOL
>>>> :-) I know what "it" is, but I don't know where it will end. Maybe
>>>> Tyvek gear and full-face respirators for all. :-)
>>>
>>> I'd think one would have more chance of liver failure from the
>>> rubbing alcohol or possibly burning to death from a leaky bottle of
>>> surgical spirit and a carelessly thrown dog -end than the chance of
>>> expiring from a supermarket trolley handle infection-but I could be
>>> wrong.
>>
>> You are wrong. The mother of a good friend contracted salmonella from
>> a cart. She was elderly and nearly died but for a wise doctor who
>> questioned everything she did and everywhere she'd been.
>
> Anecdote isn't Data. Everyone everywhere has a "I know a guy who"
> story that can back up their opinion.
>
> Hey, many of us grew up not wearing seatbelts, and carseats weren't
> even heard of.... does that fact make carseats and seatbelts
> unnecessary? Not at all.
>
> If you have hard data showing the what Mrs B is looking for, then
> you'd have a valid claim.
not if I could find more people who died on my terms - I did say one would
have "more chance"
This one almost fits the bill. What a silly man
http://www.channel3000.com/news/1693622/detail.html
|
|
Re: clorox anywhere spray
