Re: shooting yourself down - more physics?

Re: shooting yourself down - more physics?

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 rec.aviation.homebuilt    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: shooting yourself down - more physics? Rich S. Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
shooting yourself down - more physics? Smitty Two 09-10-2005
"Smitty Two" <prestwhich@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:prestwhich-E970DB.12125210092005@news.west.cox.net...

> I think I am already in that trap, but it wasn't my intention (or yours,
> I know) for this to be a trick question based on ambiguity in the
> phrasing.
>
> But, sure, I will address your concerns.
>
> 1. I didn't stipulate a vacuum. My engine and wing do not work very well
> without air. I said, to simplify calculations, ignore the effects of
> friction on the projectile. We are flying above the earth.
>
> 2. At an altitude at which acceleration due to gravity is 32 feet per
> second per second. Assume this remains constant throughout.
>
> 3. With the exception of the airplanes and the guns, this is a
> pre-Columbian question. The earth is flat. Or, if you prefer, we're
> flying tangentially to its curved surface.
>
> 4. The plane is flying level, as I believe I stated.

Kewl! That makes it easy!

I do not know.

Rich S.





other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog