Re: theoretical radio range....

Re: theoretical radio range....

  Home | Guides | Register Now! | Search | About
 rec.aviation.homebuilt    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
 Re: theoretical radio range.... Scott Reply Send to a Friend   Print
 
Subject Author Date
theoretical radio range.... Andy 03-23-2007
Oops, switch that to read the 10W will do marginally better...

Scott


Scott wrote:
> Well, that is true of an FM signal where the "capture effect" will let
> you hear the strongest signal only...on AM, you'll still hear the squeal
> if another signal comes on frequency. Aviation radios are AM, so....
>
> My personal feeling is that the 5W will do marginally better than the
> 10W radio that if there is a significant cost difference, go with 5W.
>
> Scott
>
> Kyle Boatright wrote:
>
>>
>> One thing to consider is that a 10w radio will have an easier time
>> overpowering a distant signal, so your transmissions get "stepped on"
>> less.
>>
>> KB
>>


other useful resources:
Government National Mortgage Association - Ginnie Mae
The National Home Equity Mortgage Association
Fannie Mae Mortgage
Movie-Corner.com Movie Blog