If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by shepro on April 20, 2007, 9:51 pm
Could someone please explain pro's and cons of both Halogen and Florescent
lights.And which is prefered.
Thanks
|

| |
Posted by Rick Blaine on April 20, 2007, 10:19 pm
>Could someone please explain pro's and cons of both Halogen and Florescent
>lights.And which is prefered.
Halogens have a warmer, more natural light but run very hot, especially on high
intensity. Think those old torch floor lamps, especially before they cut the
bulb back from 500w to 300w.
Fluorescents have a much cooler light and use less electricity, hence they run
cooler but don't look as well with natural wood cabinetry. You can't dim these
either.
Halogens in a bar type fixture can address some of the heat concerns that the
puck style lights have. Xenon lights have similar color to halogen but run a bit
cooler.
|
|
Posted by Paul M. Eldridge on April 20, 2007, 11:37 pm
>Could someone please explain pro's and cons of both Halogen and Florescent
>lights.And which is prefered.
> Thanks
On the plus side, fluorescents are more energy efficient, cooler
running and provide much longer service life. They're also available
in a wide range of colour temperatures (e.g., 3000K, 4,100K, 5000K,
etc.) which, depending upon your decor and personal tastes, could be
another plus. Linear fluorescents distribute light over a wider area
and this light is soft and diffuse, so there are no harsh shadows (an
important consideration when you're working with knives and other
potentially dangerous instruments). And if you prefer a lot of light,
they're the only game in town.
Halogens offer a pleasant, warm light and superior colour rendering.
They also provide more punch and sparkle, and a little more visual
interest due to their higher contrast ratios (shadowing).
I opted for low profile T4 fluorescents because they're four to five
times more energy efficient and because I prefer a lot of working
light. These particular lamps have a high CRI (colour rendering
index) of 86 and a colour temperature of 3,200K (just slighting above
that of halogen); Overall, I'm pleased with my choice.
There is, however, one notable drawback. I have highly polished
granite countertops and the bright reflections given off by these
lamps detract from its overall appearance. My sense is that the
reflections generated by smaller halogen pucks wouldn't be quite as
noticeable (or objectionable).
Cheers,
Paul
|
|
Posted by Goedjn on April 20, 2007, 11:52 pm
>Could someone please explain pro's and cons of both Halogen and Florescent
>lights.And which is prefered.
> Thanks
Halogens are small, bright, hot, and slightly more efficient than
regular incadescants.
Florescents are larger, cooler, dimmer and a lot more efficient
than regular incadescents.
Preferred for what?
|
|
Posted by ransley on April 21, 2007, 8:54 am
> >Could someone please explain pro's and cons of both Halogen and Florescent
> >lights.And which is prefered.
> > Thanks
>
> Halogens are small, bright, hot, and slightly more efficient than
> regular incadescants.
>
> Florescents are larger, cooler, dimmer and a lot more efficient
> than regular incadescents.
>
> Preferred for what?
Halogen are hot and 75%-90% less efficient than T8 flourescent, unless
electricity is of no concern its obvious what is best. Warm white
bulbs have a pleasing color.
|
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Undercounter Halogen 120v bulb (soft start device?) | December 23, 2005, 10:01 am |
| Recessed Lights to Pendant Lights | April 15, 2006, 11:03 am |
| How do I combine lights on single pole switch with lights on 3-way switch? | April 24, 2008, 12:54 pm |
| Fan lights | June 26, 2006, 5:23 pm |
| Lights out | January 15, 2007, 1:10 pm |
| Sky lights. | May 25, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| So, How do I rip these old Lights out? | July 15, 2007, 1:39 pm |
| uv lights | March 3, 2008, 11:20 pm |
| Bathroom Lights | July 30, 2005, 11:17 pm |
| Lights flickering | October 31, 2005, 9:56 pm |
|
|